Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.8 | 89 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 11 | -- |
| 2021-12-20 | 2019-08-23 |
| 6.71 x 3.01 x 0.36 inches | 5.94 x 2.83 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.34 ounces | 5.89 ounces |
| Aqua Blue, Bright Silver and Indigo Blue | Aura black, Aura glow and Aura white |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 950.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2280 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 387 pixels per inch | 400 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 SM4350 (8 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| Kryo 460, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.74 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.22 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Nano SIM Battery | 3500mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy Note10 is much better than the Motorola Moto G51 5G, getting a global score of 89 against 77.8. The Samsung Galaxy Note10 design is thinner and somewhat lighter than Motorola Moto G51 5G, despite of the fact that it was released 2 years before. Galaxy Note10 counts with a bit more powerful processor than Motorola Moto G51 5G, and although they both have 8 cores, the Galaxy Note10 also has a higher amount of RAM memory.
The Samsung Galaxy Note10 has a little bit better screen than Motorola Moto G51 5G, because although it has a bit lower resolution of 1080 x 2280 and a quite smaller display, it also counts with a little better pixels number in each inch of display. Galaxy Note10 features a bigger memory for games and applications than Moto G51 5G, because although it has no slot for an SD memory card, it also counts with 256 GB internal storage capacity.
Moto G51 5G shoots a little bit better photographs and videos than Galaxy Note10, because although it has a tinier camera aperture which is not favorable for shooting images in low light situations, and they both have the same 1920x1080 video resolution, the Moto G51 5G also counts with faster 240 frames per second video frame rates and a back facing camera with a much higher resolution.
The Moto G51 5G counts with a superior battery performance than Galaxy Note10, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.