Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.8 | 80.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 11 | -- |
| 2021-12-20 | 2015-08-21 |
| 6.71 x 3.01 x 0.36 inches | 6.03 x 3.00 x 0.30 inches |
| 7.34 ounces | 6.03 ounces |
| Aqua Blue, Bright Silver and Indigo Blue | Black sapphire, Gold platinum, Silver titan and White pearl |
| -- | Glass and Metal |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 387 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 SM4350 (8 nm) chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7420 chipset |
| Kryo 460, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2100 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619 GPU | Mali-T760 MP8 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.74 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 2560 x 1440 (60 fps) (Quad HD / 2K) slow motion video |
| 11.22 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 7 | 6.3 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Nano SIM Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Note5 has a general score of 80.2, which is a bit better than Motorola Moto G51 5G's 77.8 score. Galaxy Note5's construction is somewhat thinner and somewhat lighter than Motorola Moto G51 5G, even though it was released many years before. The Galaxy Note5 counts with just a bit better looking screen than Moto G51 5G, because although it has a quite smaller display, it also counts with a higher 1440 x 2560 pixels resolution and more pixels per inch of display.
Moto G51 5G has a very superior storage capacity to install applications and games than Samsung Galaxy Note5, and although they both have the same internal storage, the Moto G51 5G also has an external memory card slot that admits up to 512 GB. The Galaxy Note5 counts with just a little better processing power than Moto G51 5G. They have a 4 GB RAM and the same number of cores.
The Moto G51 5G counts with a much better camera than Galaxy Note5, and although they both have the same video resolution, the Moto G51 5G also has faster 240 fps video frame rates, a bigger diafragm aperture and a way more mega pixels back camera. Moto G51 5G has a really longer battery lifetime than Galaxy Note5, because it has a 67% greater battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.