Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.8 | 88.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 11 | Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2021-12-20 | 2019-03-08 |
| 6.71 x 3.01 x 0.36 inches | 5.90 x 2.77 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.34 ounces | 5.54 ounces |
| Aqua Blue, Bright Silver and Indigo Blue | Flamingo pink, Prism black, Prism blue, Prism green and Prism white |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 281.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 3040 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 387 pixels per inch | 551 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 SM4350 (8 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| Kryo 460, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.22 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Nano SIM Battery | 3400mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 5.36 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy S10 is better than Motorola Moto G51 5G, getting an 88.3 score against 77.8. Samsung Galaxy S10's construction is lighter and somewhat thinner than the Motorola Moto G51 5G, although it was released 3 years before. Both phones in this review use the same Android 11 operating system, so you shouldn't notice any difference in that aspect.
Galaxy S10 features just a bit better hardware performance than Motorola Moto G51 5G, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the Galaxy S10 also has a greater amount of RAM. The Galaxy S10 counts with a brighter display than Motorola Moto G51 5G, because although it has a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a higher screen density and a better resolution of 1440 x 3040 pixels.
Motorola Moto G51 5G counts with a bit better camera than Galaxy S10, because although it has a smaller aperture, and they both have the same video quality, the Motorola Moto G51 5G also counts with a back facing camera with a way higher resolution and better 240 frames per second video frame rate.
Samsung Galaxy S10 features a way bigger memory capacity for apps and games than Moto G51 5G, and although they both have a slot for SD memory cards that admits a maximum of 512 GB, the Samsung Galaxy S10 also has 64 GB more internal memory capacity. Moto G51 5G counts with a really longer battery lifetime than Galaxy S10, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.