Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.8 | 86.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 11 | -- |
| 2021-12-20 | 2019-03-08 |
| 6.71 x 3.01 x 0.36 inches | 5.60 x 2.75 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.34 ounces | 5.29 ounces |
| Aqua Blue, Bright Silver and Indigo Blue | Canary yellow, Flamingo pink, Prism black, Prism blue, Prism green, Prism silver and Prism white |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 408.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2280 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 387 pixels per inch | 435 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 SM4350 (8 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| Kryo 460, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.22 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Nano SIM Battery | 3100mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 5.12 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy S10e has a global score of 86.3, which is better than the Motorola Moto G51 5G's global score of 77.8. Galaxy S10e's construction is notably lighter and thinner than the Motorola Moto G51 5G, despite of the fact that it was released many years before. Samsung Galaxy S10e counts with a bit faster processing unit than Motorola Moto G51 5G, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Samsung Galaxy S10e also has a greater amount of RAM.
The Galaxy S10e counts with a little bit better screen than Moto G51 5G, because although it has a little bit smaller display and a little bit worse resolution of 1080 x 2280px, it also counts with a just a little greater count of pixels per inch in the screen. Moto G51 5G captures slightly better photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy S10e, because although it has a smaller diafragm aperture which is not favorable for taking photographs in low-light environments, and they both have the same (Full HD) video resolution, the Moto G51 5G also counts with faster video frame rate and a back-facing camera with a lot better resolution.
Galaxy S10e features a very superior memory capacity for games and applications than Motorola Moto G51 5G, and although they both have an external memory slot that allows up to 512 GB, the Galaxy S10e also has 64 GB more internal storage. Motorola Moto G51 5G features a really longer battery duration than Galaxy S10e, because it has a 61% larger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.