Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.8 | 94.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 11 | Android 13, 12, 11, 10 |
| 2021-12-20 | 2020-03-06 |
| 6.71 x 3.01 x 0.36 inches | 5.97 x 2.72 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.34 ounces | 5.78 ounces |
| Aqua Blue, Bright Silver and Indigo Blue | Cloud blue, Cloud pink, Cosmic grey and Cosmic white |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1000.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.2 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 3200 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 387 pixels per inch | 566 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 SM4350 (8 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 (7 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 460, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.22 | 10.78 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Nano SIM Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S20 is way better than Motorola Moto G51 5G, having a 94.8 score against 77.8. Both of these phones include Android OS (Operating System), but Galaxy S20 has 13 version while Motorola Moto G51 5G has Android 11. Galaxy S20's design is extremely lighter and thinner than the Motorola Moto G51 5G, despite of the fact that it was released about 22 months before.
The Galaxy S20 has a little better processing power than Motorola Moto G51 5G, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the Galaxy S20 also has a larger amount of RAM. The Galaxy S20 has a better screen than Moto G51 5G, because although it has a little smaller screen, it also counts with a higher 1440 x 3200 resolution and a greater count of pixels per inch in the display.
Galaxy S20 features a lot bigger storage for games and applications than Moto G51 5G, because it has a SD extension slot that admits up to 1000 GB and more internal memory. Motorola Moto G51 5G has greater battery performance than Galaxy S20, because it has a 25 percent bigger battery capacity. Moto G51 5G counts with a slightly better camera than Galaxy S20, and although they both have the same 1920x1080 (Full HD) video resolution and a F1.8 aperture, the Moto G51 5G also has a much higher resolution camera in the back and better 240 frames per second video frame rates.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.