Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.8 | 90.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 11 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2021-12-20 | 2020-10-02 |
| 6.71 x 3.01 x 0.36 inches | 6.29 x 2.93 x 0.33 inches |
| 7.34 ounces | 6.70 ounces |
| Aqua Blue, Bright Silver and Indigo Blue | Cloud lavender, Cloud mint, Cloud navy, Cloud orange, Cloud red and Cloud white |
| -- | Aluminum and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 509.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 387 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 SM4350 (8 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset |
| Kryo 460, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.22 | 10.56 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Nano SIM Battery | 4500mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy S20 FE is much better than the Moto G51 5G, having a score of 90.8 against 77.8. Both devices we compare here come with the same Android 11 OS. Despite of the fact that the Samsung Galaxy S20 FE is older than Moto G51 5G, it's construction is a little bit thinner and just a little bit lighter.
Galaxy S20 FE counts with a little bit better display than Motorola Moto G51 5G, because although it has a bit smaller screen, and they both have exactly the same resolution of 1080 x 2400 pixels, the Galaxy S20 FE also counts with a quite better screen density. The Galaxy S20 FE features a little bit better hardware performance than Moto G51 5G, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Galaxy S20 FE also has more RAM memory.
The Galaxy S20 FE features a much greater storage capacity for apps and games than Moto G51 5G, because it has a slot for external memory cards that allows up to 1000 GB and 64 GB more internal storage capacity. The Motorola Moto G51 5G captures a bit better pictures and videos than Galaxy S20 FE, and although they both have the same video definition and a F1.8 aperture, the Motorola Moto G51 5G also has a way higher 50 mega pixels resolution camera in the back and better 240 frames per second video frame rate.
The Motorola Moto G51 5G counts with a little longer battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy S20 FE, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity against 4500mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.