Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.8 | 98 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 11 | Android 13, 12, 11, 10 |
| 2021-12-20 | 2020-03-06 |
| 6.71 x 3.01 x 0.36 inches | 6.57 x 2.99 x 0.35 inches |
| 7.34 ounces | 7.83 ounces |
| Aqua Blue, Bright Silver and Indigo Blue | Cosmic black and Cosmic grey |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1400.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.9 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 3200 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 387 pixels per inch | 509 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 SM4350 (8 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 (7 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 460, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 40.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.22 | 13.42 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Nano SIM Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G is way better than Motorola Moto G51 5G, with a 98 score against 77.8. Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G is an older and a bit heavier device than Motorola Moto G51 5G, but Samsung was able to build it a little thinner anyway. Both devices in this comparison review use Android OS (Operating System), but the Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has a more recent 13 version and Motorola Moto G51 5G has Android 11 version, providing some additional features.
The Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G features a little faster processor than Motorola Moto G51 5G, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G also has a larger amount of RAM memory. Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has a little sharper screen than Moto G51 5G, because it has a higher pixels density, a higher 1440 x 3200 resolution and a bit larger screen.
The Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G features a much better camera than Motorola Moto G51 5G, and although they both have a same size diafragm aperture, the Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G also has a camera with a way better resolution and a lot better video resolution. The Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has a much bigger memory capacity for games and applications than Moto G51 5G, because it has a SD card slot that supports a maximum of 1000 GB and more internal memory capacity.
The Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G counts with a battery performance that's just as good as the Moto G51 5G one.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.