Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.8 | 93.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 11 | Android 13, 12 |
| 2021-12-20 | 2022-02-25 |
| 6.71 x 3.01 x 0.36 inches | 5.75 x 2.78 x 0.30 inches |
| 7.34 ounces | 5.89 ounces |
| Aqua Blue, Bright Silver and Indigo Blue | Green, Phantom Black, Pink Gold and White |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 799.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 387 pixels per inch | 422 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | Multi-touch |
| 8 | 9.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 SM4350 (8 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 SM8450 (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 460, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Quad-Core 3000 MHz + Quad-Core 1800 MHz processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619 GPU | Adreno 730 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.74 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 23.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.22 | 12.43 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Nano SIM Battery | 3700mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 5.68 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S22 is much better than the Moto G51 5G, getting a 93.4 score against 77.8. Galaxy S22 is a somewhat lighter and somewhat thinner phone than Moto G51 5G, even when both were only released 2 months apart. Both of these phones have Android OS (operating system), but Galaxy S22 has newer 13 version while Moto G51 5G has Android 11 version.
Galaxy S22 counts with a much better display than Moto G51 5G, because although it has a quite lower 1080 x 2340 resolution and a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a quite better pixel quantity per inch of display. The Samsung Galaxy S22 has a little better processing power than Motorola Moto G51 5G, and although they both have 8 processing cores, the Samsung Galaxy S22 also has more RAM.
The Motorola Moto G51 5G features a quite bigger memory capacity to install applications and games than Galaxy S22, because although it has only 64 GB internal storage, it also counts with a SD card slot that admits a maximum of 512 GB. Motorola Moto G51 5G counts with better battery duration than Galaxy S22, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity instead of 3700mAh.
The Samsung Galaxy S22 counts with a better camera than Motorola Moto G51 5G, and although they both have a same size aperture and a same resolution camera, the Samsung Galaxy S22 also has a way higher video definition.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.