Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.8 | 95.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 11 | Android 13, 12 |
| 2021-12-20 | 2022-02-25 |
| 6.71 x 3.01 x 0.36 inches | 6.43 x 3.07 x 0.35 inches |
| 7.34 ounces | 8.08 ounces |
| Aqua Blue, Bright Silver and Indigo Blue | Burgundy, Green, Phantom Black and White |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1200.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 3088 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 387 pixels per inch | 501 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1750 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 9.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 SM4350 (8 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 SM8450 (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 460, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Quad-Core 2800 MHz + Quad-Core 1800 MHz processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619 GPU | Adreno 730 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.74 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 40.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 23.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.22 | 13.75 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Nano SIM Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S22 Ultra is much better than the Moto G51 5G, having a 95.4 score against 77.8. Both of these phones have Android OS, but Galaxy S22 Ultra has a more recent 13 version and Moto G51 5G has Android 11 version, so it gives a lot of extra features and increased performance. Even though the Galaxy S22 Ultra and Moto G51 5G were released with only a couple months difference, the Galaxy S22 Ultra design is just a little bit thinner but just a little bit heavier than Moto G51 5G.
The Galaxy S22 Ultra counts with a bit superior CPU than Moto G51 5G, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the Galaxy S22 Ultra also has more RAM memory. The Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra counts with a much better display than Motorola Moto G51 5G, and although they both have a display of the same size, the Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra also has a better resolution of 1440 x 3088 and a greater pixel number in each inch in the display.
Moto G51 5G has a greater memory for applications, games, photos and videos than Galaxy S22 Ultra, because although it has less internal storage, it also counts with a slot for external memory cards that holds a maximum of 512 GB. The Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra's battery duration is very similar to the Moto G51 5G one.
The Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra takes much better pictures and videos than Motorola Moto G51 5G, and although they both have the same aperture, the Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra also has a much better 7680x4320 video resolution and a much better resolution back facing camera.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.