Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.8 | 79.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 11 | -- |
| 2021-12-20 | 2016-03-11 |
| 6.71 x 3.01 x 0.36 inches | 5.61 x 2.74 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.34 ounces | 5.36 ounces |
| Aqua Blue, Bright Silver and Indigo Blue | Black, Gold, Pink, Pink gold, Silver and White |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 4) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 124.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 5.1 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 387 pixels per inch | 576 pixels per inch |
| -- | 855 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 9.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 SM4350 (8 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| Kryo 460, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 200 GB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 8.56 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.4 inches (1/2.5") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.22 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Nano SIM Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Galaxy S7 is just a bit better than Motorola Moto G51 5G, with a 79.5 score against 77.8. Even though the Galaxy S7 is a lot older than Motorola Moto G51 5G, it's construction is somewhat thinner and way lighter. The Galaxy S7 features a much sharper screen than Moto G51 5G, because although it has a way smaller screen, it also counts with a greater pixels density and a better resolution of 1440 x 2560.
Moto G51 5G counts with a superior storage for games and applications than Samsung Galaxy S7, because it has 32 GB more internal memory capacity and a SD extension slot that allows a maximum of 512 GB. Motorola Moto G51 5G features a bit superior processing unit than Samsung Galaxy S7, and although they both have 4 GB of RAM memory, the Motorola Moto G51 5G also has 4 more CPU cores.
The Moto G51 5G takes better pictures and videos than Samsung Galaxy S7, because although it has a smaller diafragm aperture which is not favorable for taking photographs and video in low light situations, and they both have the same 1920x1080 (Full HD) video quality, the Moto G51 5G also counts with higher video frame rates and a camera with lot more megapixels.
The Motorola Moto G51 5G features a superior battery life than Galaxy S7, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity against 3000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.