Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.8 | 78.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 11 | Android 8.0 Oreo, 7.0 Nougat, 6.0 Marshmallow |
| 2021-12-20 | 2016-03-11 |
| 6.71 x 3.01 x 0.36 inches | 5.94 x 2.86 x 0.30 inches |
| 7.34 ounces | 5.54 ounces |
| Aqua Blue, Bright Silver and Indigo Blue | Black, Black pearl, Coral blue, Gold, Pink gold, Silver and White |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 4) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 336.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 387 pixels per inch | 534 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 SM4350 (8 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| Kryo 460, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 200 GB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 8.56 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.4 inches (1/2.5") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.22 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 7 | 6.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Nano SIM Battery | 3600mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 5.6 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S7 edge is a little bit better than the Moto G51 5G, having a 78.1 score against 77.8. Both devices in our current comparison include Android OS, but Galaxy S7 edge has 8.0 Oreo version while Moto G51 5G has Android 11, so it provides you some additional features. Although the Galaxy S7 edge is older than the Moto G51 5G, it's design is somewhat thinner and noticeably lighter.
Moto G51 5G features a bit faster processing unit than Samsung Galaxy S7 edge, and although they both have a 4 GB RAM, the Moto G51 5G also has 4 more cores (although slower). The Galaxy S7 edge has a bit sharper screen than Moto G51 5G, because although it has a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a better 1440 x 2560 pixels resolution and more pixels per inch of screen.
Motorola Moto G51 5G features a much better camera than Samsung Galaxy S7 edge, because although it has a smaller camera aperture, and they both have the same 1920x1080 (Full HD) video resolution, the Motorola Moto G51 5G also counts with better 240 frames per second video frame rates and a camera in the back with a much better resolution.
Moto G51 5G counts with much more memory capacity for apps and games than Galaxy S7 edge, because it has a SD card slot that holds a maximum of 512 GB and 32 GB more internal memory capacity. The Moto G51 5G features a way better battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy S7 edge, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.