Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.8 | 83.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 11 | -- |
| 2021-12-20 | 2018-03-16 |
| 6.71 x 3.01 x 0.36 inches | 5.81 x 2.70 x 0.33 inches |
| 7.34 ounces | 5.75 ounces |
| Aqua Blue, Bright Silver and Indigo Blue | Burgundy red, Coral blue, Ice blue, Lilac purple, Midnight black, Sunrise gold and Titanium gray |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 158.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2960 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 387 pixels per inch | 568 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 SM4350 (8 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Kryo 460, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 400 GB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 11.34 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.22 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Nano SIM Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S9 has a general score of 83.3, which is a bit better than Moto G51 5G's 77.8 global score. Although the Galaxy S9 is a lot older than the Moto G51 5G, it's construction is a little bit thinner and much lighter. The Galaxy S9 features just a bit better hardware performance than Motorola Moto G51 5G. They have 8 CPU cores and a 4 GB RAM memory.
The Galaxy S9 counts with a sharper display than Moto G51 5G, because although it has a bit smaller screen, it also counts with a higher 1440 x 2960 resolution and a better pixel count per screen inch. Moto G51 5G takes a bit better videos and photos than Samsung Galaxy S9, because although it has a smaller aperture which is not recommended for shooting pictures and videos in low light situations, and they both have the same 1920x1080 (Full HD) video resolution, the Moto G51 5G also counts with a back facing camera with lot more mega-pixels and better video frame rates.
Motorola Moto G51 5G counts with just a bit more memory to install applications and games than Galaxy S9, and although they both have the same internal memory, the Motorola Moto G51 5G also has a SD memory card expansion slot that admits a maximum of 512 GB. Moto G51 5G features a much longer battery duration than Samsung Galaxy S9, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity instead of 3000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.