Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.8 | 88.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 11 | Android 12, 11, 10 |
| 2021-12-20 | 2020-02-14 |
| 6.71 x 3.01 x 0.36 inches | 6.59 x 2.90 x 0.28 inches |
| 7.34 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Aqua Blue, Bright Silver and Indigo Blue | Mirror black and Mirror purple |
| -- | Aluminum |
| -- | $ 1380.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2636 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 387 pixels per inch | 425 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 SM4350 (8 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC (7 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 460, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.74 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.22 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Nano SIM Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Galaxy Z Flip has a general score of 88.5, which is much better than the Motorola Moto G51 5G's score of 77.8. These devices have Android OS (operating system), but Galaxy Z Flip has 12 version and Motorola Moto G51 5G has Android 11. The Galaxy Z Flip body is a lot thinner and lighter than Motorola Moto G51 5G, although it was released only 23 months before.
The Galaxy Z Flip has a bit better processing unit than Motorola Moto G51 5G, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Galaxy Z Flip also has a larger amount of RAM. The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip features a bit sharper display than Moto G51 5G, because although it has a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a little bit better display density and a slightly higher resolution of 1080 x 2636px.
The Moto G51 5G captures slightly better pictures and videos than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip, and although they both have a same size aperture and the same 1920x1080 video definition, the Moto G51 5G also has higher 240 frames per second video frame rate and a camera with much more MP. The Galaxy Z Flip counts with a bigger memory for games and applications than Moto G51 5G, because although it has no slot for SD memory cards, it also counts with 256 GB internal storage capacity.
Moto G51 5G features a really longer battery lifetime than Galaxy Z Flip, because it has a 52% bigger battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.