Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.8 | 92.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 11 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2021-12-20 | 2020-08-07 |
| 6.71 x 3.01 x 0.36 inches | 6.59 x 2.90 x 0.28 inches |
| 7.34 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Aqua Blue, Bright Silver and Indigo Blue | Mystic bronze, Mystic gray and Mystic white |
| -- | Aluminum |
| -- | $ 603.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2636 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 387 pixels per inch | 425 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 SM4350 (8 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB chipset |
| Kryo 460, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3100 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.74 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.22 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Nano SIM Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G has a general score of 92.3, which is much better than Moto G51 5G's score of 77.8. These phones include the same Android 11 OS (Operating System), so they should give you the same OS features. Although the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G is older than the Moto G51 5G, it's construction is way thinner and somewhat lighter.
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G counts with just a bit better display than Motorola Moto G51 5G, because although it has a little smaller screen, it also counts with a slightly higher resolution of 1080 x 2636 pixels and a little greater count of pixels in each display inch. Galaxy Z Flip 5G counts with just a bit better processing power than Motorola Moto G51 5G, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Galaxy Z Flip 5G also has a higher amount of RAM memory.
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G counts with more memory capacity to store more apps and games than Motorola Moto G51 5G, because although it has no SD memory card expansion slot, it also counts with more internal storage. The Moto G51 5G captures slightly better pictures and videos than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G, and although they both have the same video resolution and a F1.8 aperture, the Moto G51 5G also has faster video frame rates and a way better resolution camera in the back.
The Moto G51 5G counts with a much better battery performance than Galaxy Z Flip 5G, because it has a 52 percent larger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.