Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.8 | 94.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 11 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2021-12-20 | 2020-09-18 |
| 6.71 x 3.01 x 0.36 inches | 6.27 x 5.05 x 0.27 inches |
| 7.34 ounces | 9.95 ounces |
| Aqua Blue, Bright Silver and Indigo Blue | Mystic black and Mystic bronze |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass |
| -- | $ 1930.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 7.6 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2208 x 1768 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 387 pixels per inch | 372 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 SM4350 (8 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB chipset |
| Kryo 460, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3100 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.74 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.22 | 10.45 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Nano SIM Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Z Fold 2 has a general score of 94.6, which is a lot better than Moto G51 5G's global score of 77.8. Galaxy Z Fold 2's body is noticeably thinner than Moto G51 5G, although it's notably heavier and was released about a year before. Both phones in this comparison have the same Android 11 OS.
Galaxy Z Fold 2 has a little faster CPU than Moto G51 5G, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the Galaxy Z Fold 2 also has a greater amount of RAM memory. Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 counts with a slightly better display than Motorola Moto G51 5G, because although it has a quite inferior number of pixels per inch of display, it also counts with a better 1768 x 2208 pixels resolution and a little bigger display.
Moto G51 5G features a slightly better camera than Galaxy Z Fold 2, and although they both have the same 1920x1080 video resolution and a F1.8 camera aperture, the Moto G51 5G also has a lot better 50 mega pixels resolution camera in the back and better video frame rate. The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 features a greater memory to install games and applications than Moto G51 5G, because although it has no slot for an external memory card, it also counts with 192 GB more internal memory capacity.
Moto G51 5G has just a little bit longer battery performance than Galaxy Z Fold 2, because it has a 5000mAh battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.