Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72 | 90.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 13 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2022-12-15 | 2020-04-29 |
| 6.41 x 2.94 x 0.32 inches | 6.26 x 2.90 x 0.34 inches |
| 6.46 ounces | 6.60 ounces |
| Blue Lavender, Matter Charcoal and Rose Gold | Prism cube black |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 339.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 1600 x 720 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 270 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| 400 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.5 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 480+ SM4350-AC (12 nm) chipset | Samsung Exynos 980 chipset |
| processor | ARM Cortex-A77 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619 GPU | Mali-G76 MP5 GPU |
| 6.03 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 15.42 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.46 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| -- | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy A51 5G has a general score of 90.8, which is much better than the Moto G53's 72 global score. Although it's the best phone in this comparison, the Galaxy A51 5G design is incredibly older, a little bit heavier and a little bit thicker than Moto G53. Both devices in this comparison review come with Android OS (Operating System), but Galaxy A51 5G has 11 version and Moto G53 has Android 13.
Galaxy A51 5G features a slightly better screen than Moto G53, and although they both have a screen with the same size, the Galaxy A51 5G also has a greater pixels density and a way better 1080 x 2400px resolution. The Moto G53 has a little bit more storage for games and applications than Galaxy A51 5G, and although they both have equal internal storage, the Moto G53 also has a SD extension slot that holds a maximum of 1 TB.
The Galaxy A51 5G counts with a much more powerful processing unit than Motorola Moto G53, and although they both have 8 processing cores, the Galaxy A51 5G also has 2 GB more RAM. The Galaxy A51 5G has a lot better camera than Moto G53, although it has a back camera with less mega pixels and a tinier camera aperture which is not recommended for taking images and video in low light environments.
Motorola Moto G53 features just a bit longer battery duration than Galaxy A51 5G, because it has a 5000mAh battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.