Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72 | 92.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 13 | Android 10 |
| 2022-12-15 | 2020-07-16 |
| 6.41 x 2.94 x 0.32 inches | 6.41 x 2.98 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.46 ounces | 6.63 ounces |
| Blue Lavender, Matter Charcoal and Rose Gold | Prism bricks black |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 650.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1600 x 720 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 270 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| 400 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.5 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 480+ SM4350-AC (12 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 6.03 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 15.42 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.46 | 12.21 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| -- | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A71 5G UW has a score of 92.9, which is much better than Motorola Moto G53's overall score of 72. Both of these phones use Android OS, but Galaxy A71 5G UW has the previous 10 version and Motorola Moto G53 has Android 13 version. Despite being the best in this review, the Galaxy A71 5G UW body is a lot older, just a little bit heavier and a bit thicker than Motorola Moto G53.
Galaxy A71 5G UW has a little more vivid screen than Moto G53, because it has a little bit larger display, a greater screen pixel density and a lot higher 1080 x 2400 pixels resolution. The Motorola Moto G53 counts with a little bit better storage capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW, and although they both have the same 128 GB internal memory capacity, the Motorola Moto G53 also has a SD memory card expansion slot that allows a maximum of 1 TB.
Galaxy A71 5G UW has an extremely better CPU than Moto G53, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the Galaxy A71 5G UW also has 4 GB more RAM memory. Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW counts with a greater camera than Motorola Moto G53, and although they both have a same size aperture, the Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW also has a back camera with a lot higher 64 mega-pixels resolution.
Motorola Moto G53 counts with just a little bit longer battery life than Galaxy A71 5G UW, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity instead of 4500mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.