Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72 | 90.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 13 | -- |
| 2022-12-15 | 2020-08-21 |
| 6.41 x 2.94 x 0.32 inches | 6.36 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.46 ounces | 6.84 ounces |
| Blue Lavender, Matter Charcoal and Rose Gold | Mystic bronze, Mystic gray, Mystic green and Mystic red |
| Plastic and Plastic | Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1000.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1600 x 720 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 270 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| 400 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.5 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 480+ SM4350-AC (12 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB (7 nm) chipset |
| processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 6.03 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.42 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor |
| -- | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.46 | 10.67 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| -- | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 6.16 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy Note 20 has a global score of 90.8, which is a lot better than Moto G53's 72 global score. Samsung Galaxy Note 20 is an a lot older, a bit thicker and a little bit heavier cellphone than Moto G53. The Galaxy Note 20 has a much better performing processor than Motorola Moto G53, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the Galaxy Note 20 also has a larger amount of RAM memory.
Samsung Galaxy Note 20 has a little sharper display than Motorola Moto G53, because it has a greater number of pixels per inch of screen, a lot better 1080 x 2400 resolution and a quite larger screen. The Galaxy Note 20 has a better camera than Moto G53, although it has a way lower 12 megapixels resolution camera in the back, they both have a same size aperture.
Moto G53 counts with much more memory to install games and applications than Galaxy Note 20, and although they both have exactly the same internal storage, the Moto G53 also has a SD extension slot that supports a maximum of 1 TB. The Moto G53 counts with improved battery life than Galaxy Note 20, because it has a 5000mAh battery size instead of 4300mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.