Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72 | 98.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 13 | Android 13, 12, 11, 10 |
| 2022-12-15 | 2020-08-21 |
| 6.41 x 2.94 x 0.32 inches | 6.49 x 3.04 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.46 ounces | 7.34 ounces |
| Blue Lavender, Matter Charcoal and Rose Gold | Mystic black, Mystic bronze and Mystic white |
| Plastic and Plastic | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) and Stainless steel |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1300.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.9 inches |
| 1600 x 720 pixels | 3088 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 270 pixels per inch | 494 pixels per inch |
| 400 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.5 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 480+ SM4350-AC (12 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB (7 nm) chipset |
| processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 6.03 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 15.42 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor |
| -- | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.46 | 13.64 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| -- | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has a global score of 98.9, which is way better than the Motorola Moto G53's global score of 72. Galaxy Note 20 Ultra is a heavier phone than Motorola Moto G53, but they are 0.32inches thick. Both devices we are comparing here come with the same Android 13 OS (Operating System).
The Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has a much faster processor than Moto G53, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Galaxy Note 20 Ultra also has a larger amount of RAM. The Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has a much better looking display than Moto G53, because it has a way better 1440 x 3088 resolution, a much greater screen pixel density and a quite larger display.
The Moto G53 has a little bit better storage capacity for apps and games than Galaxy Note 20 Ultra, and although they both have the same 128 GB internal storage capacity, the Moto G53 also has a SD memory card expansion slot that supports up to 1 TB. The Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has a very superior camera than Moto G53, and although they both have a F1.8 diafragm aperture, the Galaxy Note 20 Ultra also has a back-facing camera with a much better resolution.
Moto G53 features a bit superior battery performance than Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.