Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72 | 79.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 13 | Android 5.1 |
| 2022-12-15 | 2015-08-13 |
| 6.41 x 2.94 x 0.32 inches | 6.03 x 3.00 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.46 ounces | 6.03 ounces |
| Blue Lavender, Matter Charcoal and Rose Gold | Black, Gold, Gray and White |
| Plastic and Plastic | Glass; metal |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 415.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 1600 x 720 pixels | 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 270 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| 400 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 7.5 | 9.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 480+ SM4350-AC (12 nm) chipset | Exynos 7 Octa 7420 chipset |
| processor | ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Single-Core 2100 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619 GPU | ARM Mali-T760 MP8 GPU |
| 6.03 | 8.46 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.42 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 2560 x 1440 (60 fps) (Quad HD / 2K) slow motion video |
| 9.46 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| -- | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.8 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| -- | 336 hours standby time 22 hours talk time |
| 6.8 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Note 5 is much better than the Motorola Moto G53, with a 79.3 score against 72. Both of these phones come with Android OS (Operating System), but Galaxy Note 5 has 5.1 version and Motorola Moto G53 has Android 13 version. Although Galaxy Note 5 is way older than Motorola Moto G53, it's design is a little lighter and a bit thinner.
Galaxy Note 5 counts with a much sharper display than Motorola Moto G53, because although it has a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a way higher pixels density and a much better resolution of 2560 x 1440px. Moto G53 counts with much more storage capacity to install games and applications than Samsung Galaxy Note 5, because it has a SD extension slot that supports a maximum of 1 TB and 64 GB more internal memory.
The Samsung Galaxy Note 5 has a lot better processing power than Moto G53, although it has an inferior number of cores , they both have a 4 GB RAM memory. The Moto G53 has a much longer battery performance than Samsung Galaxy Note 5, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity. Galaxy Note 5 shoots a bit better photos and videos than Motorola Moto G53, although it has a lot lower 16 MP resolution camera in the back and a tinier aperture which is worse for shooting images or videos in low light environments.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.