Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72 | 89 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 13 | -- |
| 2022-12-15 | 2019-08-23 |
| 6.41 x 2.94 x 0.32 inches | 5.94 x 2.83 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.46 ounces | 5.89 ounces |
| Blue Lavender, Matter Charcoal and Rose Gold | Aura black, Aura glow and Aura white |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 950.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 1600 x 720 pixels | 2280 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 270 pixels per inch | 400 pixels per inch |
| 400 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.5 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 480+ SM4350-AC (12 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 6.03 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.42 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.46 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| -- | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 3500mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy Note10 is way better than the Moto G53, having an 89 score against 72. Samsung Galaxy Note10 is an incredibly older phone than the Moto G53, but Samsung could make it a little bit thinner and a little bit lighter anyway. Galaxy Note10 counts with a little bit better looking screen than Moto G53, because although it has a bit smaller display, it also counts with a lot better 1080 x 2280 resolution and more pixels per inch in the display.
The Moto G53 features a quite bigger memory capacity to store more apps and games than Galaxy Note10, because although it has just 128 GB internal storage, it also counts with a slot for an external memory card that supports up to 1 TB. Galaxy Note10 has an extremely better processing unit than Moto G53, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Galaxy Note10 also has more RAM.
The Motorola Moto G53 has a much better battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy Note10, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity. The Galaxy Note10 shoots clearer videos and photos than Moto G53, because although it has a much less megapixels camera, it also counts with a larger aperture to take better captures in low light situations.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.