Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72 | 88.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 13 | Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2022-12-15 | 2019-03-08 |
| 6.41 x 2.94 x 0.32 inches | 5.90 x 2.77 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.46 ounces | 5.54 ounces |
| Blue Lavender, Matter Charcoal and Rose Gold | Flamingo pink, Prism black, Prism blue, Prism green and Prism white |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 281.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 1600 x 720 pixels | 3040 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 270 pixels per inch | 551 pixels per inch |
| 400 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.5 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 480+ SM4350-AC (12 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 6.03 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 15.42 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.46 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| -- | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 3400mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 5.36 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy S10 is way better than the Moto G53, getting an 88.3 score against 72. Both devices we compare here work with Android OS, but Samsung Galaxy S10 has 11 version while Moto G53 has Android 13. Samsung Galaxy S10 is an notably older phone than the Moto G53, but Samsung made it a little bit thinner and somewhat lighter.
The Galaxy S10 features a lot better processing power than Moto G53, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Galaxy S10 also has more RAM memory. The Galaxy S10 has a more vivid display than Moto G53, because although it has a quite smaller display, it also counts with a much higher 1440 x 3040 resolution and a way higher number of pixels per display inch.
The Motorola Moto G53 counts with a bit bigger memory for apps and games than Galaxy S10, and although they both have exactly the same internal storage, the Motorola Moto G53 also has an external memory slot that holds a maximum of 1 TB. Galaxy S10 takes just a bit better pictures and videos than Motorola Moto G53, because although it has a way lower resolution back facing camera, it also counts with a bigger diafragm aperture.
The Moto G53 features a very superior battery duration than Samsung Galaxy S10, because it has a 47% more battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.