Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72 | 86.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 13 | -- |
| 2022-12-15 | 2019-03-08 |
| 6.41 x 2.94 x 0.32 inches | 5.60 x 2.75 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.46 ounces | 5.29 ounces |
| Blue Lavender, Matter Charcoal and Rose Gold | Canary yellow, Flamingo pink, Prism black, Prism blue, Prism green, Prism silver and Prism white |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 408.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 1600 x 720 pixels | 2280 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 270 pixels per inch | 435 pixels per inch |
| 400 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.5 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 480+ SM4350-AC (12 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 6.03 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 15.42 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.46 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| -- | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 3100mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 5.12 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S10e is much better than the Moto G53, with an 86.3 score against 72. Even though Galaxy S10e is noticeably older than the Moto G53, it's design is just a little bit thinner and somewhat lighter. Galaxy S10e features a brighter display than Moto G53, because although it has a bit smaller screen, it also counts with a lot better 1080 x 2280 pixels resolution and a way higher screen density.
Moto G53 counts with a slightly bigger storage capacity for games and applications than Galaxy S10e, and although they both have the same internal memory, the Moto G53 also has an external memory card slot that allows a maximum of 1 TB. The Samsung Galaxy S10e has a very superior processing unit than Moto G53, and although they both have 8 CPU cores, the Samsung Galaxy S10e also has more RAM.
Motorola Moto G53 has a very superior battery performance than Galaxy S10e, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity instead of 3100mAh. The Galaxy S10e shoots a little bit better pictures and videos than Moto G53, because although it has a way worse 12 megapixels resolution back facing camera, it also counts with a bigger camera aperture.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.