Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72 | 90.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 13 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2022-12-15 | 2020-10-02 |
| 6.41 x 2.94 x 0.32 inches | 6.29 x 2.93 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.46 ounces | 6.70 ounces |
| Blue Lavender, Matter Charcoal and Rose Gold | Cloud lavender, Cloud mint, Cloud navy, Cloud orange, Cloud red and Cloud white |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 509.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 1600 x 720 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 270 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| 400 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.5 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 480+ SM4350-AC (12 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 6.03 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 15.42 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.46 | 10.56 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| -- | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4500mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy S20 FE is much better than the Moto G53, having a 90.8 score against 72. Both of these phones have Android operating system, but the Samsung Galaxy S20 FE has an older 11 version while Moto G53 has Android 13. Although it's the best in this review, the Samsung Galaxy S20 FE design is older, a little bit thicker and just a bit heavier than the Moto G53.
The Galaxy S20 FE features a bit more vivid screen than Motorola Moto G53, and although they both have a display of the same size, the Galaxy S20 FE also has a way better 1080 x 2400 resolution and a higher pixels count per inch in the display. The Galaxy S20 FE has a much better performance than Moto G53, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Galaxy S20 FE also has 2 GB more RAM.
Motorola Moto G53 counts with a bit more memory to install applications and games than Samsung Galaxy S20 FE, and although they both have equal 128 GB internal storage capacity, the Motorola Moto G53 also has an external memory card slot that allows a maximum of 1 TB. The Motorola Moto G53 counts with a bit superior battery life than Galaxy S20 FE, because it has an 11% larger battery size.
Samsung Galaxy S20 FE captures much clearer videos and photos than Moto G53, although it has a back-facing camera with much less mega-pixels resolution, they both have a same size camera aperture.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.