Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72 | 98 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 13 | Android 13, 12, 11, 10 |
| 2022-12-15 | 2020-03-06 |
| 6.41 x 2.94 x 0.32 inches | 6.57 x 2.99 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.46 ounces | 7.83 ounces |
| Blue Lavender, Matter Charcoal and Rose Gold | Cosmic black and Cosmic grey |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1400.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.9 inches |
| 1600 x 720 pixels | 3200 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 270 pixels per inch | 509 pixels per inch |
| 400 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.5 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 480+ SM4350-AC (12 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 (7 nm) chipset |
| processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 6.03 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 15.42 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 40.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| -- | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.46 | 13.42 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| -- | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G is a lot better than the Motorola Moto G53, with a overall score of 98 against 72. Both of these devices work with the same Android 13 OS (Operating System), so both of them should give you the same OS features. The Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G is a way older, heavier and just a little thicker phone than the Motorola Moto G53.
The Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has a much better performance than Motorola Moto G53, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G also has a larger amount of RAM. Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has a much better screen than Motorola Moto G53, because it has a way higher resolution of 1440 x 3200 pixels, a lot higher pixels count per display inch and a little bigger display.
The Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G captures way better pictures and videos than Motorola Moto G53, and although they both have a same size aperture, the Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G also has a much more megapixels camera in the back. Motorola Moto G53 features a bit bigger memory for applications, games, photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G, and although they both have exactly the same internal memory, the Motorola Moto G53 also has a slot for external memory cards that allows up to 1 TB.
Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G's battery lifetime is just as good as the Motorola Moto G53 one.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.