Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72 | 77.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 13 | Android 4.4.2 |
| 2022-12-15 | 2014-06-23 |
| 6.41 x 2.94 x 0.32 inches | 5.67 x 2.91 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.46 ounces | 5.57 ounces |
| Blue Lavender, Matter Charcoal and Rose Gold | Blue and Red |
| Plastic and Plastic | -- |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 299.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 5.1 inches |
| 1600 x 720 pixels | 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 270 pixels per inch | 432 pixels per inch |
| 400 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 7.5 | 9.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 480+ SM4350-AC (12 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 801 MSM8974-AC chipset |
| processor | Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2500 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 2 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| Adreno 619 GPU | Adreno 330 (450 MHz) GPU |
| 6.03 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 16 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 15.42 | 6.72 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 2.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| -- | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 9.46 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM |
| -- | SIM |
| 10.6 | 7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 2800mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| -- | 390 hours standby time 21 hours talk time |
| 6.8 | 4.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 4.0, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy S5 Sport is a bit better than Motorola Moto G53, having a 77.8 score against 72. Samsung Galaxy S5 Sport's design is somewhat lighter than Motorola Moto G53, although it's a little bit thicker and was released 9 years before. Both of these phones come with Android OS, but Samsung Galaxy S5 Sport has the newer 4.4.2 version and Motorola Moto G53 has Android 13, offering some extra features and improved performance.
The Samsung Galaxy S5 Sport has an incredibly better looking display than Moto G53, because although it has a lot smaller screen, it also counts with a lot higher pixels amount per inch in the display and a higher 1920 x 1080 resolution. The Motorola Moto G53 has a much better memory for apps and games than Galaxy S5 Sport, because it has a slot for an SD memory card that admits up to 1 TB and 112 GB more internal storage capacity.
Samsung Galaxy S5 Sport counts with a much greater processing power than Moto G53, because although it has less cpu cores (but faster) and 2 GB less RAM, it also counts with an additional graphics processing unit. Moto G53 features a really longer battery performance than Galaxy S5 Sport, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity instead of 2800mAh.
Galaxy S5 Sport has a little bit better camera than Motorola Moto G53, although it has a back-facing camera with a much lower resolution and a tinier diafragm aperture which is not recommended for shooting photographs or video in poorly lited environments.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.