Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72 | 81.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 13 | -- |
| 2022-12-15 | 2017-04-21 |
| 6.41 x 2.94 x 0.32 inches | 5.86 x 2.68 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.46 ounces | 5.47 ounces |
| Blue Lavender, Matter Charcoal and Rose Gold | Arctic silver, Burgundy red, Coral blue, Maple gold, Midnight black, Orchid gray and Rose pink |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 173.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 1600 x 720 pixels | 2960 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 270 pixels per inch | 568 pixels per inch |
| 400 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.5 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 480+ SM4350-AC (12 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2350 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 6.03 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 15.42 | 10.78 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.46 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| -- | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S8 is better than the Moto G53, with a general score of 81.7 against 72. The Galaxy S8 is an extremely older phone than the Moto G53, but Samsung was able to build it somewhat lighter and just a little bit thinner. Galaxy S8 features a much better performance than Motorola Moto G53. Both of them have a Octa-Core processor and a 4 GB RAM.
The Samsung Galaxy S8 features a much better screen than Motorola Moto G53, because although it has a quite smaller display, it also counts with a much higher resolution of 1440 x 2960px and a way higher pixel number per inch of display. Galaxy S8 features just a bit better camera than Moto G53, because although it has a way worse resolution back facing camera, it also counts with a larger diafragm aperture to take better low-light images.
Moto G53 counts with a superior storage capacity to install games and applications than Galaxy S8, because it has a SD extension slot that admits a maximum of 1 TB and 128 GB internal memory. The Moto G53 has a much better battery performance than Galaxy S8, because it has a 5000mAh battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.