Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72 | 92.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 13 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2022-12-15 | 2020-08-07 |
| 6.41 x 2.94 x 0.32 inches | 6.59 x 2.90 x 0.28 inches |
| 6.46 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Blue Lavender, Matter Charcoal and Rose Gold | Mystic bronze, Mystic gray and Mystic white |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum |
| -- | $ 603.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1600 x 720 pixels | 2636 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 270 pixels per inch | 425 pixels per inch |
| 400 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.5 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 480+ SM4350-AC (12 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB chipset |
| processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3100 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 6.03 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.42 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.46 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| -- | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy Z Flip 5G has an overall score of 92.3, which is way better than the Motorola Moto G53's 72 global score. Both phones in this review work with Android OS, but Galaxy Z Flip 5G has the older 11 version while Motorola Moto G53 has Android 13. Galaxy Z Flip 5G's construction weights the same than Motorola Moto G53, but it is thinner.
The Galaxy Z Flip 5G counts with a much greater processing power than Moto G53, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Galaxy Z Flip 5G also has a larger amount of RAM memory. Galaxy Z Flip 5G counts with a brighter display than Moto G53, because it has a way greater quantity of pixels per inch of display, a way better resolution of 1080 x 2636 pixels and a little larger screen.
The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G features a little bit better camera than Motorola Moto G53, although it has a back camera with a much lower 12 megapixels resolution, they both have a F1.8 camera aperture. The Moto G53 has a bigger memory to install games and applications than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G, because although it has just 128 GB internal memory, it also counts with an external SD slot that admits a maximum of 1 TB.
The Motorola Moto G53 features a much better battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G, because it has a 52% more battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.