Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.2 | 87.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | LG |
| Android 13 | -- |
| 2023-09-14 | 2020-05-15 |
| 6.36 x 2.91 x 0.35 inches | 6.58 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.77 ounces | 6.35 ounces |
| Midnight Blue, Mint Green and Pearl Blue | Aurora gray, Aurora green, Aurora silver, Aurora white and Illusion sunset |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 264.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2460 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | P-OLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.5 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Mediatek Dimensity 7020 (6 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| IMG BXM-8-256 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.46 | 11.44 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 6000mAh Battery | 4300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 7.52 | 6.16 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The LG Velvet is much better than Moto G54, having an 87.1 score against 73.2. The LG Velvet body is thinner and a bit lighter than the Moto G54, even though it was released many years before. LG Velvet has a very superior CPU than Moto G54, although it has lesser RAM, they both have a Octa-Core processing unit.
The LG Velvet has a bit better looking display than Moto G54, because although it has a little bit worse screen density, it also counts with a little bit larger screen and a quite better resolution of 1080 x 2460. The LG Velvet has a much better storage to store more games and applications than Moto G54, and although they both have exactly the same internal memory capacity, the LG Velvet also has a slot for an SD memory card that allows a maximum of 1,95 TB.
The Moto G54 counts with a superior battery duration than LG Velvet, because it has a 40% greater battery size. The LG Velvet shoots greater photos and videos than Moto G54, although it has a camera in the back with less MP, they both have a same size aperture.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.