Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.2 | 98.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 13 | Android 13, 12, 11, 10 |
| 2023-09-14 | 2020-08-21 |
| 6.36 x 2.91 x 0.35 inches | 6.49 x 3.04 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.77 ounces | 7.34 ounces |
| Midnight Blue, Mint Green and Pearl Blue | Mystic black, Mystic bronze and Mystic white |
| Plastic and Plastic | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) and Stainless steel |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1300.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.9 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 3088 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 494 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.5 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Mediatek Dimensity 7020 (6 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB (7 nm) chipset |
| processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| IMG BXM-8-256 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor |
| -- | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.46 | 13.64 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 6000mAh Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 7.52 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has a general score of 98.9, which is much better than the Motorola Moto G54's overall score of 73.2. Even though Galaxy Note 20 Ultra is notably older and a bit heavier than the Motorola Moto G54, it's body is still a bit thinner. Both of these phones use the same Android 13 OS, so both of them should give you all the same operating system features.
Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra features a very superior processing power than Moto G54, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra also has 4 GB more RAM memory. Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has a sharper screen than Motorola Moto G54, because it has a bit higher screen pixel density, a higher resolution of 1440 x 3088 pixels and a little bit larger display.
Galaxy Note 20 Ultra features a way better camera than Moto G54, and although they both have a same size aperture, the Galaxy Note 20 Ultra also has a back-facing camera with lot more megapixels. The Galaxy Note 20 Ultra features a much better memory capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Moto G54, and although they both have equal internal memory, the Galaxy Note 20 Ultra also has a SD memory slot that holds up to 1000 GB.
The Motorola Moto G54 features better battery performance than Galaxy Note 20 Ultra, because it has 6000mAh of battery capacity against 4500mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.