Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.2 | 79.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 13 | Android 5.1 |
| 2023-09-14 | 2015-08-13 |
| 6.36 x 2.91 x 0.35 inches | 6.03 x 3.00 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.77 ounces | 6.03 ounces |
| Midnight Blue, Mint Green and Pearl Blue | Black, Gold, Gray and White |
| Plastic and Plastic | Glass; metal |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 415.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 7.5 | 9.4 |
| Performance | |
| Mediatek Dimensity 7020 (6 nm) chipset | Exynos 7 Octa 7420 chipset |
| processor | ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Single-Core 2100 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| IMG BXM-8-256 GPU | ARM Mali-T760 MP8 GPU |
| 6.21 | 8.46 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 2560 x 1440 (60 fps) (Quad HD / 2K) slow motion video |
| 9.46 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.8 |
| Battery Life | |
| 6000mAh Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| -- | 336 hours standby time 22 hours talk time |
| 7.52 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Galaxy Note 5 is a bit better than the Motorola Moto G54, with a general score of 79.3 against 73.2. Both phones we compare here use Android OS (operating system), but the Galaxy Note 5 has an older 5.1 version and Motorola Moto G54 has Android 13. Galaxy Note 5's body is lighter and somewhat thinner than the Motorola Moto G54, although it was released 8 years before.
Samsung Galaxy Note 5 counts with a much better hardware performance than Moto G54, although it has a lower number of cores and a smaller amount of RAM. Samsung Galaxy Note 5 features an incredibly better looking display than Moto G54, because although it has a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a greater quantity of pixels per display inch and a higher 2560 x 1440 resolution.
Galaxy Note 5 shoots slightly better photographs and videos than Moto G54, although it has a tinier diafragm aperture and a lot worse 16 mega pixels resolution back camera. The Moto G54 features a much better storage capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Galaxy Note 5, because it has 128 GB internal memory capacity.
Moto G54 counts with a way better battery life than Galaxy Note 5, because it has a 6000mAh battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.