Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.2 | 90.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 13 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2023-09-14 | 2020-10-02 |
| 6.36 x 2.91 x 0.35 inches | 6.29 x 2.93 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.77 ounces | 6.70 ounces |
| Midnight Blue, Mint Green and Pearl Blue | Cloud lavender, Cloud mint, Cloud navy, Cloud orange, Cloud red and Cloud white |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 509.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.5 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Mediatek Dimensity 7020 (6 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| IMG BXM-8-256 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.46 | 10.56 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 6000mAh Battery | 4500mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 7.52 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S20 FE is way better than Moto G54, getting a overall score of 90.8 against 73.2. Both devices in our current comparison have Android OS (Operating System), but Galaxy S20 FE has an older 11 version while Moto G54 has Android 13 version. Although Galaxy S20 FE is a lot older than Moto G54, it's body is just a bit lighter and just a bit thinner.
The Samsung Galaxy S20 FE counts with just a bit better looking display than Moto G54. They have the same exact resolution of 1080 x 2400px, a screen of the same size and a better amount of pixels per inch of display. Samsung Galaxy S20 FE features much more memory capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Motorola Moto G54, and although they both have the same 128 GB internal storage, the Samsung Galaxy S20 FE also has a slot for an external memory card that supports a maximum of 1000 GB.
Samsung Galaxy S20 FE counts with an extremely better processor than Moto G54, although it has a smaller amount of RAM memory, they both have a Octa-Core processor. Moto G54 has longer battery performance than Galaxy S20 FE, because it has a 6000mAh battery capacity against 4500mAh. The Galaxy S20 FE has a much better camera than Motorola Moto G54, although it has a camera with a lot worse 12 mega pixels resolution, they both have a F1.8 diafragm aperture.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.