Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.2 | 98 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 13 | Android 13, 12, 11, 10 |
| 2023-09-14 | 2020-03-06 |
| 6.36 x 2.91 x 0.35 inches | 6.57 x 2.99 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.77 ounces | 7.83 ounces |
| Midnight Blue, Mint Green and Pearl Blue | Cosmic black and Cosmic grey |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1400.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.9 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 3200 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 509 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.5 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Mediatek Dimensity 7020 (6 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 (7 nm) chipset |
| processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| IMG BXM-8-256 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 40.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| -- | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.46 | 13.42 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 6000mAh Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 7.52 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G is a lot better than Moto G54, getting a global score of 98 against 73.2. The Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G design has the same thickness than the Moto G54, but it's heavier. These devices include the same Android 13 OS. Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G counts with a way better processing power than Moto G54, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G also has a greater amount of RAM memory.
The Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has a more vivid screen than Motorola Moto G54, because it has more pixels per display inch, a higher resolution of 1440 x 3200px and a bit bigger screen. The Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has a very superior camera than Moto G54, and although they both have a same size camera aperture, the Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G also has a camera with a much better 108 mega-pixels resolution.
The Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has a way bigger memory capacity for apps and games than Moto G54, and although they both have exactly the same 128 GB internal memory capacity, the Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G also has a SD memory slot that admits a maximum of 1000 GB. The Motorola Moto G54 has superior battery duration than Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G, because it has 6000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.