Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.8 | 88.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Apple |
| 2017-08-01 | 2017-11-03 |
| 6.04 x 3.00 x 0.37 inches | 5.65 x 2.79 x 0.30 inches |
| 5.93 ounces | 6.14 ounces |
| Gold, Gray and White | Silver and Space gray |
| Metal | Glass and Stainless steel |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 144.00 | $ 1149.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2436 x 1125 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 401 pixels per inch | 463 pixels per inch |
| -- | 625 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 8953 chipset | Apple A11 Bionic APL1W72 (10 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | 64-bit Monsoon and Mistral, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2390 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Adreno 506 GPU | Apple 3-core GPU GPU |
| 9.09 | 10.17 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.02 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.57 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.1 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 2716mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.96 | 4.72 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2, EDR | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The iPhone X has a score of 88.1, which is better than the Moto G5S Plus's 74.8 global score. Although iPhone X and Moto G5S Plus were released only a few months apart, iPhone X's body is somewhat thinner but also just a little bit heavier. IPhone X has a much better looking display than Moto G5S Plus, because it has a slightly higher 1125 x 2436 resolution, a bit bigger screen and a quite better pixel number per display inch.
The Apple iPhone X counts with a much bigger storage capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Moto G5S Plus, because although it has no SD card slot, it also counts with 192 GB more internal memory capacity. The Apple iPhone X has a superior processing unit than Moto G5S Plus, because although it has less cpu cores (although they are faster) and less RAM, it also counts with a 64 bits CPU.
The iPhone X shoots a little bit better photos and videos than Moto G5S Plus, because although it has a worse resolution camera in the back and a lower 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution, it also counts with a larger aperture to capture better low light photos and video. The Motorola Moto G5S Plus has just a bit longer battery duration than iPhone X, because it has a 3000mAh battery capacity instead of 2716mAh.
Although iPhone X is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than Moto G5S Plus, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as the Moto G5S Plus. If you are trying to save some money, you can get Moto G5S Plus, letting go a couple features and specs, but you'll get the most with your money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.