Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.8 | 80 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| 2017-08-01 | 2018-10-18 |
| 6.04 x 3.00 x 0.37 inches | 5.73 x 2.69 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.93 ounces | 5.22 ounces |
| Gold, Gray and White | Black, Pink and White |
| Metal | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 144.00 | $ 157.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2160 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | P-OLED |
| 401 pixels per inch | 439 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 8953 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2500 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 506 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.02 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.57 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.1 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 2915mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.96 | 4.88 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2, EDR | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 3 is a little bit better than Moto G5S Plus, with a overall score of 80 against 74.8. The Google Pixel 3 is a newer cellphone, and it is also thinner and lighter than the Moto G5S Plus. Google Pixel 3 has a bit sharper screen than Moto G5S Plus, and although they both have a same size display, the Google Pixel 3 also has a slightly higher 1080 x 2160 pixels resolution and a just a bit more pixels per inch of screen.
Moto G5S Plus has a very superior memory capacity for games and applications than Google Pixel 3, and although they both have the same 64 GB internal memory, the Moto G5S Plus also has a slot for an external memory card that supports up to 128 GB. Google Pixel 3 features a bit more powerful processor than Motorola Moto G5S Plus. They have 4 GB of RAM memory and a Octa-Core processor.
Motorola Moto G5S Plus has just a bit longer battery duration than Google Pixel 3, because it has a 3 percent greater battery capacity. Google Pixel 3 captures slightly better videos and photos than Motorola Moto G5S Plus, because although it has a back facing camera with less MP resolution and a lower (4K) video definition, it also counts with a larger camera aperture.
Google Pixel 3 is a little more expensive than Moto G5S Plus, but it's still a good choice, as you can get a better phone for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.