Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.8 | 81.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| 2017-08-01 | 2019-10-24 |
| 6.04 x 3.00 x 0.37 inches | 5.79 x 2.71 x 0.32 inches |
| 5.93 ounces | 5.71 ounces |
| Gold, Gray and White | Clearly white, Just black and Oh so orange |
| Metal | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 144.00 | $ 339.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2280 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 401 pixels per inch | 443 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 8953 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 506 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.02 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.57 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.1 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 2800mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.96 | 4.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2, EDR | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 4 is slightly better than Moto G5S Plus, with an 81.9 score against 74.8. The Google Pixel 4 is a way newer phone, and it is also somewhat thinner and a little bit lighter than Moto G5S Plus. Google Pixel 4 has a bit superior processing unit than Moto G5S Plus, and although they both have 8 CPU cores, the Google Pixel 4 also has a larger amount of RAM memory.
Google Pixel 4 features a little bit better looking screen than Motorola Moto G5S Plus, because it has a slightly better 1080 x 2280 resolution, a just a bit higher pixel count in each inch in the screen and a little bigger display. Google Pixel 4 shoots slightly better videos and photos than Motorola Moto G5S Plus, because although it has a back-facing camera with a lower resolution and a worse video quality, it also counts with a bigger aperture.
The Motorola Moto G5S Plus has a much greater storage capacity for games and applications than Google Pixel 4, and although they both have the same 64 GB internal memory capacity, the Motorola Moto G5S Plus also has a slot for external memory cards that holds up to 128 GB. Moto G5S Plus counts with just a little bit longer battery performance than Google Pixel 4, because it has a 3000mAh battery capacity.
Although Google Pixel 4 is a better device, it is way more expensive than the Moto G5S Plus, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as Moto G5S Plus. If you want to save a few dollars, you can get Moto G5S Plus, and give up a few features and specifications, but you will get the most out of your budget.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.