Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.8 | 82.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| -- | Android 11, 10 |
| 2017-08-01 | 2020-08-20 |
| 6.04 x 3.00 x 0.37 inches | 5.67 x 2.73 x 0.32 inches |
| 5.93 ounces | 5.04 ounces |
| Gold, Gray and White | Just black |
| Metal | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 144.00 | $ 349.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 401 pixels per inch | 444 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 8953 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G SM7150-AA chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 506 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.02 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.57 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.1 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3140mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 5.12 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2, EDR | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 4a is better than Motorola Moto G5S Plus, getting a global score of 82.9 against 74.8. Google Pixel 4a's body is much newer, lighter and somewhat thinner than Motorola Moto G5S Plus. Google Pixel 4a has just a bit better hardware performance than Moto G5S Plus, and although they both have 8 cores, the Google Pixel 4a also has a greater amount of RAM memory.
The Google Pixel 4a has a bit more vivid display than Moto G5S Plus, because it has a bit bigger display, a little higher resolution of 1080 x 2340 pixels and a just a little greater pixels quantity per display inch. The Google Pixel 4a captures slightly better videos and photos than Moto G5S Plus, because although it has a lesser MP resolution camera in the back and a lower 3840x2160 (4K) video definition, it also counts with a bigger aperture to capture better captures and video in poorly lited situations.
The Google Pixel 4a has a slightly bigger memory to install applications and games than Moto G5S Plus, because although it has no slot for SD memory cards, it also counts with 128 GB internal memory. Google Pixel 4a counts with just a little better battery duration than Moto G5S Plus, because it has 3140mAh of battery capacity instead of 3000mAh.
Although Google Pixel 4a is a better device, it costs a lot more than Motorola Moto G5S Plus, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as Motorola Moto G5S Plus. So if you need that extra features, you can buy the Google Pixel 4a, but if you don't you can save some money and get the Motorola Moto G5S Plus, letting go some features and specs.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.