Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.8 | 87.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| -- | Android 11 |
| 2017-08-01 | 2020-11-19 |
| 6.04 x 3.00 x 0.37 inches | 6.06 x 2.91 x 0.32 inches |
| 5.93 ounces | 5.93 ounces |
| Gold, Gray and White | Clearly white and Just black |
| Metal | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 144.00 | $ 500.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.2 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 401 pixels per inch | 416 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 8953 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 506 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.02 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.57 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.1 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3885mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 5.84 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2, EDR | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 4a 5G has a global score of 87.5, which is much better than Moto G5S Plus's score of 74.8. The Google Pixel 4a 5G construction has the same weight than the Moto G5S Plus, but it's thinner. The Google Pixel 4a 5G features a slightly better screen than Moto G5S Plus, because it has a little bit higher display pixel density, a bit bigger screen and a little higher 1080 x 2340px resolution.
Google Pixel 4a 5G has slightly more memory capacity to store more games and applications than Moto G5S Plus, because although it has no SD memory slot, it also counts with 128 GB internal storage. The Google Pixel 4a 5G features a bit superior processor than Moto G5S Plus, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Google Pixel 4a 5G also has a higher amount of RAM memory.
Google Pixel 4a 5G counts with greater battery life than Moto G5S Plus, because it has a 30% larger battery capacity. The Google Pixel 4a 5G features a slightly better camera than Moto G5S Plus, because although it has a worse video quality and a lesser MP resolution camera in the back, it also counts with a larger aperture.
Although Google Pixel 4a 5G is a better device, it costs a lot more money than Motorola Moto G5S Plus, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as Motorola Moto G5S Plus. So if you want that extra features, you can buy the Google Pixel 4a 5G, but if you don't you can save some dollars and get the Motorola Moto G5S Plus, letting go some features and specs.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.