Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.8 | 89 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| 2017-08-01 | 2020-10-15 |
| 6.04 x 3.00 x 0.37 inches | 5.70 x 2.77 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.93 ounces | 5.33 ounces |
| Gold, Gray and White | Just black and Sorta sage |
| Metal | Aluminum and Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 144.00 | $ 548.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 401 pixels per inch | 430 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 8953 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 506 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.02 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.57 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.1 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4080mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.96 | 6 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2, EDR | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 5 is better than Moto G5S Plus, having an 89 score against 74.8. The Google Pixel 5 is a newer device, and it is also lighter and thinner than Moto G5S Plus. The Google Pixel 5 counts with a little faster processor than Moto G5S Plus, and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the Google Pixel 5 also has 4 GB more RAM memory.
The Google Pixel 5 has a bit sharper display than Moto G5S Plus, because it has a just a bit greater pixel density, a bit larger screen and a bit higher 1080 x 2340 pixels resolution. Google Pixel 5 features a bit better camera than Motorola Moto G5S Plus, because although it has a worse video resolution and a back facing camera with a lower resolution, it also counts with a bigger diafragm aperture to take better low light photos and videos.
The Google Pixel 5 has a slightly better storage capacity for games and applications than Moto G5S Plus, because although it has no SD card slot, it also counts with 128 GB internal memory capacity. The Google Pixel 5 has a much better battery duration than Moto G5S Plus, because it has 4080mAh of battery capacity.
Although Google Pixel 5 is a better device, it costs a lot more than the Motorola Moto G5S Plus, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as the Motorola Moto G5S Plus. So if you want that extra specs and features, you can buy Google Pixel 5, otherwise you can save a couple dollars and get the Motorola Moto G5S Plus, letting go a couple specs and features.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.