Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.8 | 82.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | LG |
| -- | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2017-08-01 | 2019-11-01 |
| 6.04 x 3.00 x 0.37 inches | 6.27 x 2.98 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.93 ounces | 6.77 ounces |
| Gold, Gray and White | Aurora black |
| Metal | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 144.00 | $ 222.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 401 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 8953 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 506 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.02 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 25.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.57 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.1 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.96 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2, EDR | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
LG G8X ThinQ has a general score of 82.7, which is better than the Moto G5S Plus's global score of 74.8. Even though the LG G8X ThinQ is somewhat heavier than the Moto G5S Plus, it's thinner and also way newer. The LG G8X ThinQ has a slightly better looking screen than Motorola Moto G5S Plus, because it has a bigger display, a bit higher 1080 x 2340 pixels resolution and a quite better pixel density.
LG G8X ThinQ features a bit superior processor than Motorola Moto G5S Plus, and although they both have the same number of cores, the LG G8X ThinQ also has more RAM. LG G8X ThinQ features a much bigger storage capacity for games and applications than Motorola Moto G5S Plus, because it has 128 GB internal memory capacity and a slot for an SD memory card that holds a maximum of 1,95 TB.
The LG G8X ThinQ shoots just a bit better photos and videos than Motorola Moto G5S Plus, because although it has a lower 3840x2160 video resolution and a back facing camera with a worse 12 MP resolution, it also counts with a bigger aperture to capture better photography and video in low light situations.
The LG G8X ThinQ features improved battery duration than Moto G5S Plus, because it has a 4000mAh battery capacity.
The LG G8X ThinQ is a lot more expensive than Moto G5S Plus, but it's still a good choice, because you can get a lot more for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.