Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.8 | 85.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | LG |
| -- | Android 10 |
| 2017-08-01 | 2020-11-06 |
| 6.04 x 3.00 x 0.37 inches | 6.55 x 3.04 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.93 ounces | 7.14 ounces |
| Gold, Gray and White | Titan gray |
| Metal | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 144.00 | $ 395.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 401 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 8953 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 SM6350 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 560, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 506 GPU | Adreno 619L GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.02 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 25.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.57 | 11.77 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.1 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2, EDR | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
LG K92 is much better than Moto G5S Plus, having a score of 85.4 against 74.8. LG K92's design is much newer and thinner, but heavier than Moto G5S Plus. LG K92 counts with a display that's just as good as the screen in Motorola Moto G5S Plus, because although the LG K92 has a just a bit inferior pixel amount in each inch in the screen, it also counts with a little higher resolution of 1080 x 2400 pixels and a bigger display.
The LG K92 counts with a much bigger memory for games and applications than Moto G5S Plus, because it has a slot for external memory cards that admits a maximum of 1,95 TB and 128 GB internal memory capacity. The LG K92 has a little faster processing unit than Moto G5S Plus, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the LG K92 also has a larger amount of RAM memory.
The LG K92 counts with a lot better camera than Moto G5S Plus, and although they both have the same 30 fps video frame rate and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality, the LG K92 also has a camera with a way higher 64 MP resolution and a larger aperture to capture better low-light photography and videos.
The LG K92 features better battery life than Motorola Moto G5S Plus, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity.
Although LG K92 is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than the Moto G5S Plus, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as the Moto G5S Plus. If you prefer to save some money, you can get the Moto G5S Plus, letting go a few specs and features, but you'll get the most with your budget.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.