Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.8 | 82.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | LG |
| -- | Android 8.0 Oreo |
| 2017-08-01 | 2018-03-09 |
| 6.04 x 3.00 x 0.37 inches | 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches |
| 5.93 ounces | 5.57 ounces |
| Gold, Gray and White | 16 777 216 |
| Metal | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 144.00 | $ 930.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2880 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | P-OLED |
| 401 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 8953 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 506 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.02 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| -- | 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.57 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.1 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.96 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2, EDR | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The LG V30S ThinQ is much better than the Moto G5S Plus, having an 82.5 score against 74.8. Even though LG V30S ThinQ and the Moto G5S Plus were released only 7 months apart, LG V30S ThinQ is a lot thinner and a little bit lighter. The LG V30S ThinQ counts with a little bit better looking display than Moto G5S Plus, because it has a bit larger screen, a better screen density and a way better resolution of 1440 x 2880 pixels.
LG V30S ThinQ features just a bit better hardware performance than Moto G5S Plus, and although they both have the same number of cores, the LG V30S ThinQ also has more RAM memory. LG V30S ThinQ takes just a bit better videos and photos than Moto G5S Plus, and although they both have the same video frame rates and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition, the LG V30S ThinQ also has a bigger diafragm aperture for better low light photography and videos and a camera in the back with a better resolution.
LG V30S ThinQ has a very superior storage capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Moto G5S Plus, because it has 128 GB internal storage and an external memory card slot that supports a maximum of 1,95 TB. LG V30S ThinQ has just a bit longer battery lifetime than Motorola Moto G5S Plus, because it has a 3300mAh battery size instead of 3000mAh.
Although LG V30S ThinQ is a better device, it costs a lot more money than Moto G5S Plus, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as Moto G5S Plus. So if you need that extra specs, you can buy LG V30S ThinQ, but if you don't you can save some dollars and get the Moto G5S Plus, letting go some features and specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.