Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.8 | 81.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | LG |
| 2017-08-01 | 2018-06-08 |
| 6.04 x 3.00 x 0.37 inches | 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches |
| 5.93 ounces | 5.57 ounces |
| Gold, Gray and White | Black and Gray |
| Metal | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 144.00 | $ 261.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2880 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | P-OLED |
| 401 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 8953 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 506 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.02 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| -- | 30.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.57 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.1 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.96 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2, EDR | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
LG V35 ThinQ is a bit better than the Motorola Moto G5S Plus, having a general score of 81.3 against 74.8. LG V35 ThinQ's construction is newer, just a bit lighter and a lot thinner than Motorola Moto G5S Plus. LG V35 ThinQ has just a bit better display than Motorola Moto G5S Plus, because it has a much better 1440 x 2880 resolution, a greater pixel quantity per inch of display and a little bit bigger display.
The LG V35 ThinQ counts with a way bigger storage to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Motorola Moto G5S Plus, and although they both have equal 64 GB internal storage capacity, the LG V35 ThinQ also has a SD memory card expansion slot that admits a maximum of 1,95 TB.
The LG V35 ThinQ has just a little better processing power than Moto G5S Plus, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the LG V35 ThinQ also has 2 GB more RAM memory. LG V35 ThinQ features a little better battery performance than Motorola Moto G5S Plus, because it has 3300mAh of battery capacity.
LG V35 ThinQ has a slightly better camera than Moto G5S Plus, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality and the same video frame rate, the LG V35 ThinQ also has a more megapixels camera and a bigger diafragm aperture.
Although LG V35 ThinQ is a better device, it costs a lot more money than Moto G5S Plus, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as the Moto G5S Plus. If you prefer to save some dollars, you can buy Moto G5S Plus, giving up a couple features, but you'll get the most out of your money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.