Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.8 | 76.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Nokia |
| 2017-08-01 | 2019-03-03 |
| 6.04 x 3.00 x 0.37 inches | 6.10 x 2.95 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.93 ounces | 6.07 ounces |
| Gold, Gray and White | Blue |
| Metal | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 144.00 | $ 699.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2880 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | P-OLED |
| 401 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 8953 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 506 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.02 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.57 | 9.68 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.1 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3320mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.96 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2, EDR | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Nokia 9 PureView is a bit better than the Motorola Moto G5S Plus, getting a 76.4 score against 74.8. The Nokia 9 PureView design is newer and somewhat thinner than Motorola Moto G5S Plus's, but it is a little heavier. The Nokia 9 PureView counts with a bit sharper display than Moto G5S Plus, because it has a little bit bigger display, a way better resolution of 1440 x 2880 and a higher pixel quantity per inch in the screen.
Nokia 9 PureView features a little faster CPU than Moto G5S Plus, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Nokia 9 PureView also has more RAM. Nokia 9 PureView shoots clearer photos and videos than Moto G5S Plus, because although it has a lower 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution and a worse resolution camera in the back, it also counts with a larger aperture.
Nokia 9 PureView has a little bit better storage to install games and applications than Moto G5S Plus, because although it has no external memory card slot, it also counts with 128 GB internal storage. Nokia 9 PureView has just a little bit longer battery lifetime than Motorola Moto G5S Plus, because it has 3320mAh of battery capacity against 3000mAh.
Although Nokia 9 PureView is a better device, it is way more expensive than the Motorola Moto G5S Plus, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as Motorola Moto G5S Plus. If you want to save a few dollars, you can buy Motorola Moto G5S Plus, letting go a few features and specifications, but you will get the most out of your budget.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.