Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.8 | 76.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| -- | Android 10 |
| 2017-08-01 | 2020-09-02 |
| 6.04 x 3.00 x 0.37 inches | 6.64 x 3.07 x 0.38 inches |
| 5.93 ounces | 7.76 ounces |
| Gold, Gray and White | Sonic silver |
| Metal | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) and Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 144.00 | $ 579.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| 401 pixels per inch | 385 pixels per inch |
| -- | 600 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 8953 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 506 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.02 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (15 fps) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.57 | 12.32 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.1 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2, EDR | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Nubia Red Magic 5S is a bit better than Moto G5S Plus, having a general score of 76.2 against 74.8. Nubia Red Magic 5S's body is extremely newer, but a little thicker and extremely heavier than the Moto G5S Plus. The nubia Red Magic 5S counts with a bit sharper screen than Moto G5S Plus, because although it has a bit lower screen density, it also counts with a bit higher 1080 x 2340px resolution and a larger screen.
The nubia Red Magic 5S features a little bit more memory for applications and games than Motorola Moto G5S Plus, because although it has no SD card slot, it also counts with 64 GB more internal memory capacity. Nubia Red Magic 5S features a bit better processing unit than Moto G5S Plus, and although they both have 8 CPU cores, the nubia Red Magic 5S also has a larger amount of RAM.
The nubia Red Magic 5S has a way better battery duration than Moto G5S Plus, because it has a 4500mAh battery capacity. Nubia Red Magic 5S captures much better pictures and videos than Moto G5S Plus, because it has a larger aperture, a much more megapixels camera and a much better 7680x4320 video resolution.
Although nubia Red Magic 5S is a better device, it is way more expensive than the Moto G5S Plus, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as the Moto G5S Plus. So if you want that extra specs, you can buy the nubia Red Magic 5S, otherwise you can save some money and buy the Moto G5S Plus, letting go a couple features and specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.