Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.8 | 83.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| 2017-08-01 | 2019-03-15 |
| 6.04 x 3.00 x 0.37 inches | 6.24 x 2.93 x 0.30 inches |
| 5.93 ounces | 5.86 ounces |
| Gold, Gray and White | Black, Blue, Coral and White |
| Metal | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 144.00 | $ 202.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 401 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 8953 chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9610 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 506 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.02 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 25.00 MP + 25.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.57 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.1 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2, EDR | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy A50 is much better than Motorola Moto G5S Plus, having a score of 83.8 against 74.8. Galaxy A50's design is newer, somewhat thinner and just a bit lighter than Motorola Moto G5S Plus. The Samsung Galaxy A50 counts with a little bit better processing power than Motorola Moto G5S Plus. Both have a 4 GB RAM and a Octa-Core processing unit.
The Galaxy A50 features a bit sharper display than Motorola Moto G5S Plus, because it has a larger screen, a little higher resolution of 1080 x 2340 pixels and a little higher pixel number per inch of display. The Samsung Galaxy A50 has just a bit better camera than Moto G5S Plus, and although they both have the same 1920x1080 (Full HD) video resolution and the same 30 frames per second video frame rates, the Samsung Galaxy A50 also has a bigger diafragm aperture for better low-light photos and video and a back-facing camera with lot more mega-pixels.
The Galaxy A50 features much more memory to install applications and games than Moto G5S Plus, because it has 64 GB more internal memory capacity and a slot for external memory cards that holds up to 512 GB. Galaxy A50 counts with better battery performance than Motorola Moto G5S Plus, because it has a 4000mAh battery size.
The Galaxy A50 is a lot more expensive than the Moto G5S Plus, but it's still a good choice, because you can get a lot more features for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.