Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.8 | 90.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| -- | Android 11, 10 |
| 2017-08-01 | 2020-04-29 |
| 6.04 x 3.00 x 0.37 inches | 6.26 x 2.90 x 0.34 inches |
| 5.93 ounces | 6.60 ounces |
| Gold, Gray and White | Prism cube black |
| Metal | Aluminum and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 144.00 | $ 339.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 401 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 8953 chipset | Samsung Exynos 980 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A77 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 506 GPU | Mali-G76 MP5 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.02 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.57 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.1 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2, EDR | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A51 5G is a lot better than Moto G5S Plus, with a 90.8 score against 74.8. The Galaxy A51 5G construction is way newer and just a little thinner, but heavier than the Moto G5S Plus. Galaxy A51 5G counts with a little better performance than Moto G5S Plus, and although they both have 8 CPU cores, the Galaxy A51 5G also has a greater amount of RAM.
Galaxy A51 5G has a bit more vivid screen than Moto G5S Plus, because it has a larger display, a little bit higher 1080 x 2400px resolution and a bit better screen pixels density. Samsung Galaxy A51 5G counts with a greater camera than Moto G5S Plus, and although they both have a same size camera aperture, the same video frame rates and the same 3840x2160 video definition, the Samsung Galaxy A51 5G also has a back camera with much more mega pixels.
The Galaxy A51 5G features a way bigger memory to store more games and applications than Moto G5S Plus, because it has a slot for an external memory card that holds up to 1000 GB and 128 GB internal storage capacity. Galaxy A51 5G has a very superior battery duration than Moto G5S Plus, because it has a 50% larger battery size.
The Samsung Galaxy A51 5G costs a lot more than the Moto G5S Plus, but you can get a much better phone for that extra dollars.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.