Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.8 | 90.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| 2017-08-01 | 2021-03-17 |
| 6.04 x 3.00 x 0.37 inches | 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.93 ounces | 6.67 ounces |
| Gold, Gray and White | -- |
| Metal | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 144.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 401 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 8953 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 506 GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.02 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.57 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.1 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2, EDR | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A52 has a global score of 90.7, which is way better than Motorola Moto G5S Plus's 74.8 global score. Although Samsung Galaxy A52 is somewhat heavier than Motorola Moto G5S Plus, it's thinner and extremely newer. The Samsung Galaxy A52 counts with a bit better looking screen than Moto G5S Plus, because it has a larger display, a little better screen density and a slightly better 1080 x 2400px resolution.
The Galaxy A52 has a lot bigger storage capacity to install applications and games than Moto G5S Plus, because it has a slot for an SD memory card that holds a maximum of 1 TB and more internal storage capacity. The Samsung Galaxy A52 has a bit better processing unit than Moto G5S Plus, and although they both have 8 CPU cores, the Samsung Galaxy A52 also has a larger amount of RAM.
The Samsung Galaxy A52 features a very superior battery life than Moto G5S Plus, because it has a 50 percent more battery capacity. The Galaxy A52 counts with a greater camera than Moto G5S Plus, and although they both have the same 30 fps video frame rates and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution, the Galaxy A52 also has a bigger camera aperture to take better low light images and video and a camera in the back with much more mega-pixels.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.