Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.8 | 91.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| -- | Android 12, 11 |
| 2017-08-01 | 2021-03-19 |
| 6.04 x 3.00 x 0.37 inches | 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.93 ounces | 6.67 ounces |
| Gold, Gray and White | -- |
| Metal | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 144.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 401 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 8953 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 (8 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 506 GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.02 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.57 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.1 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2, EDR | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy A52 5G has an overall score of 91.3, which is a lot better than Moto G5S Plus's score of 74.8. Galaxy A52 5G is a extremely newer and thinner cellphone than Moto G5S Plus, although it's somewhat heavier. Samsung Galaxy A52 5G features a little more vivid display than Moto G5S Plus, because it has a bigger display, a little better display pixel density and a bit higher 1080 x 2400px resolution.
Samsung Galaxy A52 5G counts with a superior storage to store more games and applications than Moto G5S Plus, because it has 128 GB internal memory and a slot for SD memory cards that holds a maximum of 1 TB. The Samsung Galaxy A52 5G counts with just a bit better hardware performance than Motorola Moto G5S Plus, and although they both have 8 processing cores, the Samsung Galaxy A52 5G also has more RAM.
The Galaxy A52 5G features a way better camera than Moto G5S Plus, and although they both have the same 30 fps video frame rates and the same (4K) video quality, the Galaxy A52 5G also has a larger aperture to take better photos and video in poorly lited environments and a way more MP camera in the back.
The Galaxy A52 5G has a superior battery lifetime than Moto G5S Plus, because it has a 50% larger battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.