Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.8 | 91.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| -- | Android 11 |
| 2017-08-01 | 2021-09-01 |
| 6.04 x 3.00 x 0.37 inches | 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.93 ounces | 6.67 ounces |
| Gold, Gray and White | Awesome Black, Awesome Mint, Awesome Violet and Awesome White |
| Metal | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 144.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 401 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 8953 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G SM7325 (6 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 670, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 506 GPU | Adreno 642L GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.02 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.57 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.1 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2, EDR | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A52s is a lot better than Motorola Moto G5S Plus, with a general score of 91.1 against 74.8. Although Samsung Galaxy A52s is somewhat heavier than Motorola Moto G5S Plus, it's thinner and also incredibly newer. The Galaxy A52s features a bit better performance than Motorola Moto G5S Plus, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Galaxy A52s also has a greater amount of RAM.
The Galaxy A52s counts with just a bit better looking screen than Moto G5S Plus, because it has a just a little more pixels per display inch, a quite better 1080 x 2400 resolution and a bigger screen. Samsung Galaxy A52s has much more memory capacity for games and applications than Motorola Moto G5S Plus, because it has an external memory slot that admits a maximum of 1 TB and more internal memory capacity.
Galaxy A52s has a very superior battery life than Motorola Moto G5S Plus, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity. Galaxy A52s has a very superior camera than Motorola Moto G5S Plus, and although they both have the same 30 frames per second video frame rates and the same (4K) video definition, the Galaxy A52s also has a back-facing camera with a much better resolution and a bigger diafragm aperture for better photography and videos in poorly lited situations.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.